Music-story's audio Reviews on Newgrounds

[Stereo Love {Full Remake}]

3 years ago it was zerobass that took all the top spots in the dance section. I guess its you now. Here are my thoughts.

Old classic tune I loved many years ago. I will say its not quite as good as the original, but I will compliment you on the bass and chordal instrument.

0:33 the lead instrument was a bit of a disappointment. For me this instrument took away that heavenly feel. Maybe it needs more reverb. Also the background percussion accompanying the claps sounds muffled. Not sure if you were doing that on purpose, but it took away the tight/clean feel to the song.

1:12 Good job on the ethnic instrument. I know it has been used in house music from the professionals before, however, I still like the change from all the serious hardcore instruments the dance music section portrays. Dance is not trance.

Overall the female voice is good like the original. However, at 1:35 the guy sounds like he is whispering. Kind of creeps me out. Kudos for making a happy song even if it is just a remix. There is a difference from the teen happy hardcore and a happy song and since I like the latter much better, 5/5

Bye for now

kirja100 responds:

Thanks!

[Break It Down [SB]]

Hi,

Happy new year to you as well.

Here are my thoughts:

Intro:
Not so concerned with the beginning beat, but the build up is a little too slow...acceptable for trance music, dance not so much. I'm not a fan of the guy yelling ??? before he says "break it down". Other than that, good use of fx sounds.

0:56-1:23
I don't see that typical bass pattern as a bad thing if used in small parts of the song which you do nicely before the next transition.

1:23-1:50
I can see what you were trying to do with the offbeat drums. Good idea to keep things interesting. That lead instrument could use a bit of work. Sounds too happy hardcore young teen music. If your are a young teen then ignore me...but as you listen to more club electronic music you will agree with me.

1:50-2:32
Perhaps this is where I cannot comment on fairly as many like the triplet pattern, but I'm not a huge fan because it is like an excuse to use the exact same pattern as you did in 1:23 part with just triplets added on.

The rest of your song loops which I'm not saying is bad, but not something I need to critique again.
Overall, good song. You mix genre together which is a great move on your part. Best of luck in the future.

ShadowBeatzInc responds:

Wow. I appreciate the detailed critique. Did not expect that, thank you. I'll definitely take it all into consideration.

(Would have been nice to know the one synth sounded like a happy hardcore synth a year ago when I was trying to dabble in that genre XD)

[Hell Song]

I remember listening to this a while back in a combo compilation of guilty gear xx. What happened to sum 41? Anyway, the vocals on your version is not as good as the original. Other than that, everything sounds pretty similar. However, you did mention you did this as a quick project. So my only critique is to do more for your future remixing projects because usually remixes you can tell a difference in instruments used, perhaps a added intro, or a combination with other music artists. Best of luck in the future.

AJSarah responds:

sum 41 got dted by other good bands and their ranks went down because of the new songs that peoples were hearing. their band also had some awful fights like stress,so their bands broke apart.

[{Kavi} Pacifica]

Review

Hi Kawika,

What does Pacifica mean? I don't want to turn up the bass. Its you who should raise the bass for me when you mix a song. Here is what I thought.

The intro is okay. Not something amazing considering the bass and lead are playing the same pattern. I do like the bass sound though. Maybe use a better lead instrument next time. Especially at 42 seconds. That's a generic sample right there.

Not a bad transition at 56 seconds. Good job with the panning vox fx.

56 seconds again I think the bass works well here. The drums are good. Just that generic lead really destroys the experience. Some mean bass and some cheesy happy hardcore lead just doesn't mesh well for me.

Some of your fx sounds are actually quite neat. Kudos on making them. I also like the instrument at 2:33 seconds. However, again that fuzzy lead and generic sample ruins the moment. You should have used that 2:33 instrument more in this song.

So the song pretty much repeats until the end. No need to repeat myself again.

Overall, I feel this song isn't fully complete. Some instruments sound like you spent a good deal of time on. Some just feel like you got lazy and took the easy route to finish this song at a faster rate. The patterns of your fuzzy instrument is like 1/8 notes over and over again. There is essentially no change to this 1/8 pattern. Try to come up with more complicated patterns or you could always mix 1/8 stuff with quarter notes, half notes, 1/16, or anything else to get me a bit more surprised thus excited. Your song ain't that bad, but there definitely is room for improvement. Your on the right track though. Keep it up. 5/5 and 9/10 review

Bye for now

DjKavi responds:

Pacifica= a generic tropical name. Usually names dont really have to mean anything except give the right message. What i ment by turn up the bass is a figure of speach.

I do agree that this piece can use some work, i think that way with all of my musics.

I really do appreciate your review, its criticism like this is what actually causes improvements.

Kavi

[Submergence - Unity]

Review

Thanks for letting me know about your new stuff. Makes my life easier so I don't have to keep looking at your account. Continue pm me about your new songs and I'll continue checking them out.

Here is what I thought:
Beginning of the song, sorry I didn't like that lead pattern. It sounds almost exactly like a folk or child song I heard back when I was a kid. I don't remember the original song which bugs me since it is a popular song. However, the octaves alternating instrument wasn't so bad. I think it would have sounded much better with delay on it.

Nice build up to 1:03. I like the patterns used and the octave playing instrument now seems to work better in this section. I would have liked the bass to be slightly more distorted, but its good enough.

Like always, I don't take marks off for repetitiveness in trance so this is just to make you aware. I felt the 1:03 to 3 just felt dragged out. Plus the transition really only transitions into the same thing to 4:00. You could at least add some more instruments or drums on top.

Overall, some parts stood out, but some parts seemed lacking too. I know its tough to make a song from 0:00 to the very end sound exciting, but who said making good music is easy. I have a feeling you wanted some beautiful trance at 3:03. Your going to need a lot more reverb on that lead instrument (the one playing one note from time to time) The ending portion of the song is strange. The song should have started with that part and jump straight into the main beat. However, this is just a opinion.

Keep it up. 5/5 and 9//10
Bye for now

Submergence responds:

Really appreciate you reviewing our mixes. They have been a valuable resource for our productions. Thanks!

_submergence

[~ElpH~System Virus]

Review

Hi Elph,

Interesting song you have here. Sounds weird with the phaser or phaser type of effect you used in this song....weird can be good at times. I think what heavytank meant is more dynamic sounding instruments. Everything feels muffled as if you raised all the eq bands rather than specifically select one range. I know its the easy way to bring fill to your songs, but easy doesn't always mean better.

As for the composition, you got some nice panning going on. The effects are quite nice. Filter modulations are decent. You know what you should do with your explosion fx sounds? Sidechain them. It sounds way more better when you do that instead of just fading or decaying them out. Also try to have your patterns move around more instead of having them stay on one note. Eg. C chords and patterns transition to A chords and patterns, to F, G etc.

As for your series of songs on this type of music, go for it. It has that weird feeling that makes it different from your typical song. Just work more on the dynamics of your instruments, add some sidechaining not just tremelo or panning. And just a personal opinion add some more distortion. I love distorted instruments.

Keep it up. 5/5 and 9/10
Bye for now

Elph responds:

Mmk, ill take all of you suggestions into consideration when i do my new song.
Thanks. :)

[Walk On The Ceiling 2]

Review

I think I responded to one of your reviews (the Yurei song) where I told you some steps to improve. Check that review response out.

Supposed to sound like fart noise? Well then I guess your song is good. :) Not sure where your title name came from.

You mentioned about volume differences. I think if you use the "normalize" feature in any audio editor program you can balance out the too loud and too quiet instruments. I do all that within my music program saving me the time of using any editor program (eg. audacity, soundtrack pro). Audacity is pretty poor at normalizing so a better way is to use "EQUALIZERS" and "SPREADERS". I like to use a 8 band EQ and simply mess around with all the bands until something clear comes out. Every instrument you have (even drums) should have a eq on it. No exceptions because EQ is the best sound shaping tool in electronic music programs.

A spreader will essentially control where your instruments sound the loudest in your headphones. For eg, you can make one instrument play louder in the far left of the speaker while another is more louder in the middle left of your speakers. This is different from panning because the instrument signal is not 100% transferring to where ever you want the instrument to pan. The instrument is still playing through the whole range of the speakers (just like as if you had no panning) but has more loud areas in specific areas of your speaker. It really helps organize your instruments thus more clarity. Your trying to get all the instruments playing loudly in one area of the speakers thus damping the "less louder" instruments.

Try using those two plugins I said....and experiment alot with them. There are other helpful plugins to use to help make your music sound a bit more better, but take things one at a time.

5/5 and sure 9/10 for the farting noises.
Bye for now

SuperKirbyMaster responds:

- I hope you listened to the whole song and not just the farting noises throughout the beginning...
- Yes, I read your response to my review of Yurei, and it's easier said than done.
- Now I have a few things to say: I will try implementing an equalizer with a spreader, and not just panning. BUT, I have this 1 major problem. You, whenever you make music, you just go with whatever you feel like doing, then make some changes, because you know how to completely manipulate your program, logic pro 8, correct? Well I cannot work with such ease, because I am still trying to figure out how most of my program works. This is why my music is very limited to presets and other things. I cannot even properly use a free filter, or any kind of filter for that matter, by using it with transitions. I have to have it either on or off. I don't even know all the terms used for such production of music. I am still a lowly beginner. I know, I know, you'll say to go watch some tutorials. But those are very time-consuming. And not all of them are GOOD tutorials. Maybe you know a few good ones?
- I noticed in your reply that you said you used a regular keyboard. Logic Pro 8 allows for such implementation? I myself use everything that's already there, and I don't use any samples or import anything. Very limited, I know.

- Well, I hope you understand my situation.
P.S. Besides the usual "be a harsh judge on your own work", "look at a professional's work" and "be motivated", is there any other general tips I could use? (Besides me looking up tutorials on how to actually use my program)

~Thanks for the review, your help is appreciated.~
-SKM

[The End of Our Journey]

Well, video game reviews aren't my forte, but..

Don't expect any intricate review here. I'm not a video game genre fan here. Anyway, I only played one game with banjo tooie so your remix doesn't sound familiar to me. I like the happy vibes. At least it isn't some cheesy happy hardcore fuzzy instruments blaring out.

Well, can't give you much for originality for obvious reasons. A question about this remix though. Do you produce this from scratch using your ears only or do you get some outline draft of all the notes and just put it in your music program and change the instruments? I never remixed a song so I don't know how you remixers do it. If you did it by ear I give you props.

Technically, I like how you panned the bass to the left and put the rest of the instruments on the right speaker. Everything sounds really clear. The bass does not give this annoying feedback and any unwanted noise. Perhaps you used a noise gate?

Not surprisingly, I don't have much to say about this song. It makes me feel happy. Maybe some background ambient sounds (eg. birds, seawaves,etc) could make this song more happy. I've heard some video game songs on NG and a lot of them seem to be some sped of version of the original. I like how you kept your song simple. It actually doesn't have those moments where you "use one finger and mash as fast as you can at the keyboard". Good job, I assume you have a good background in piano or some other instrument.

5/5 and 9/10 review. (Remixes never get a 10 from me. Just my standards)

Bye for now

itsameyayo responds:

Haha, it's not a remix. I was simply inspired by the style of music. And if it was a remix, I do it by ear, though I don't always get the chords right that way.

As far as the panning, thank you! It's actually a bass sample from the classical writing program called "Finale," so it was a fairly good sample as it was. I just made sure that the volume was balanced otherwise.

I agree with the sound effect comment. I think a nature soundscape would be perfect for this piece.

Thank you :)

-ImperfectDisciple

[Submergence - Elixir]

So, no one reviewed this song yet got top 5?

Seriously, people on NG need to review songs more. Is evolution recordings a professional label?

I didn't find your backing digital like sounds to be amazing. The bass sounds much better. I'll let you off for that bass pattern. Overused in my opinion.

58 seconds the digital sounds really take a toll. Can you lower the upper frequencies a bit on them? At a louder volume they hurt my ears. Easy fix.

1:00 a pretty good transition. Nice job.

1:12 I'm not a big fan of that horn like instrument playing that rhythm. And those digital high freq. instruments come back in. :(

2:10 kudos on bringing everything together. Gives me this space voyage kind of feel. Nice fx sounds. They seemed to be sidechained or have deep tremelo to them. I always like that.

Well, yes the boom sub fx to transition to the fade out. Pretty good, not saying its something new though..

I would have liked this song much more if those high frequencies were not killing my ears! There is not much diversity going on, but this is trance so expected. Not putting any drop in your score, but it would be nice to see a song with a tad bit more diversity.

Keep making music. 5/5 and 9/10 review

Bye for now

Submergence responds:

Appreciate your review! Very helpful information. We'll keep this is mind when putting together our next tune. If you want you can listen to our first song, "New Beginning" for now.

_submergence

[[RM] - Night Time WIP2]

Reinventing music?

Hi Randomizer,

Unfortunately I don't think this is reinventing music at all. I'm sure everyone has heard that typical happy hardcore bass beat on the up beat (Sometimes I get confused with downbeat and upbeat...get them in opposite terms, but you know what I mean about the bass).

Your digital panning leads don't seem to be sounding unique. I can almost say they sound generic. The basic drum loop is not something very technical. However, I'll give you credit for that wood block hit sound. Sounds like a instrument more than a percussional instrument though.

55 seconds in comes the generic fuzz instrument. I'm not sure about this. I guess this song is only a WIP...2. I suppose the final version will be a lot better.

Lastly, I have feeling you decided to use one finger when making your piano composition. It doesn't sound like a great deal of effort was put in to making a intriguing piano composition.

Overall, I congratulate you on the top 5. Someone or some people must be really trying to lower your song. I'll do the opposite by giving you a 5/5 vote and 8/10 review. GL with the final project.

Bye for now

Randomizor responds:

Thanks for an awesome review!